In the context of the current conflict in the Gaza Strip, many soldiers and civilians have lost their lives. Thousands of deaths have been reported, but this number is changing daily. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his government, especially over the situation in Gaza, are facing a lot of criticism. International circles and human rights organizations are expressing concern about the humanitarian situation of the people in Gaza, but Netanyahu and his administration have not made any visible steps or statements on this matter. Many experts and political analysts believe that Netanyahu does not have any special thoughts or views on the lives of the people trapped in Gaza.
Critics of the situation have noted that the Netanyahu government's statements on the situation in Gaza often take a one-sided stance on security and defense issues, while ignoring the plight of ordinary people or humanitarian concerns. However, the possibility that the Israeli government's position may change under international pressure in this case remains unresolved.
Golan's comments are somewhat suggestive of the political and personal motives of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. According to him, Netanyahu wants to use the war to strengthen his political position and fulfill some personal goals, which are suppressing the desire to stop the war.
Netanyahu and his administration are strengthening their position on security and defense in the context of this war, but Golan and other critics believe that such military conflicts are increasing the suffering and loss of civilians, but Netanyahu wants to keep the war going for his political purposes. According to him, stopping the war may mean losing some political gains, which is unacceptable to Netanyahu.
Such comments could have a significant impact on the Israeli government's foreign relations, domestic politics, and public sentiment. The protracted nature of the war not only increases humanitarian suffering, but could also change the political landscape, especially as international criticism of Netanyahu or his administration increases.
Golan also claimed that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is avoiding the second phase of ceasefire talks, even though an agreement was in place to begin the second phase on the 16th day of the first phase. According to him, Israel is avoiding these talks, which could lead to a serious political crisis.
It also makes it clear that Netanyahu is refusing to change his position, despite international pressure on Israel to end the war or to reach a ceasefire. Golan sees this situation as a major political move for the Israeli leadership, which could lead to a protracted conflict rather than a resolution to the crisis.
Furthermore, the lack of a second phase of ceasefire negotiations threatens to continue the suffering of the people of Gaza. This situation could have a negative impact on the Israeli government, not only from a humanitarian perspective, but also from the international community.
Golan, who did not support Netanyahu's position, said those who are demanding the release of hostages from Gaza need to understand one important thing. "We need to move towards a long-term ceasefire and withdraw from most of the Gaza Strip," he said.
This proves that Golan believes that it is necessary to reach a sustainable solution, not just a temporary ceasefire, which can help avoid further conflicts and humanitarian crises in the future. According to him, changing the situation in the Gaza Strip and withdrawing from it is essential for long-term peace.
Golan's statement reflects a strategic perspective, emphasizing the need for more concrete steps towards a lasting and effective peace rather than temporary solutions.
Golan has previously spoken out against the policies of the current Israeli government and Netanyahu's actions on several occasions. He has often criticized the government's military strategy and political decisions, which have complicated the situation in Gaza. As a result, there has been constant criticism among opposition leaders about the situation in Gaza and Netanyahu's position on the negotiations regarding it.
The opposition claims that Netanyahu's actions in Gaza are not only humanitarian but also politically dangerous. They say that Netanyahu's policies have embroiled Israel in a protracted conflict that is a major obstacle to peace.
In addition, many critics believe that Israel, under Netanyahu's leadership, is not paying any attention to the ceasefire and that the situation is getting worse. This situation could also negatively affect Israel's image and relations in the international arena.
As the situation escalates, Netanyahu's actions raise even greater questions in Israeli politics. In particular, the way he seeks to gain political advantage during the war, which analysts fear could lead to greater opposition movements and political unrest in the future.
Netanyahu's decisions and the actions of his government are creating divisions in Israeli society. On the one hand, his supporters believe that Netanyahu is capable of securing the country with tough measures, while on the other hand, opponents accuse him of prolonging the war to strengthen his political position in the midst of the crisis.
Such a situation could create political instability in Israel in the long term. If opposition parties and the general public believe that Netanyahu is focusing more on his own political gains than on national security, it could spark widespread protests and movements. In particular, if the conflict in Gaza and the humanitarian crisis intensify, distrust of the government within Israel could grow even more.
Analysts say the biggest challenge for Israel now is to find a sustainable political solution in the midst of the crisis, one that will lead not just to an end to the war, but to long-term peace and stability.